Accounting: John Smith Tax Issue Sample Essay

1a ) . How is the $ 300. 000 treated for intents of federal income revenue enhancement?
The $ 300. 000 that John Smith received would be treated as income. Harmonizing to the IRS. income is classified as “earned income includes all the nonexempt income and rewards you get from working. ” such as: •wages. wages. tips. and other nonexempt employee wage ;

•union work stoppage benefits ;
•long-term disablement benefits received prior to minimum retirement age ; •net net incomes from self-employment. such as ain or run a concern ; and •gross income received as statutory employee.

John Smith will be taxed on his income of $ 300. 000 irrespective if he received the sum as a ball amount or in rente. The constructive reception philosophy states that “… taxpayer is apt for income. which has non been physically received. but has been credited to the taxpayer’s history or otherwise becomes available for him or her to pull upon in the hereafter. ” Beginnings:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Internal Revenue Services. gov/Individuals/What-is-Earned-Income % 3F
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. investopedia. com/terms/c/constructive-receipt. asp # axzz2DGo3VwsO

1b ) . How is the $ 25. 000 treated for intents of federal income revenue enhancement?
The $ 25. 000 is an out of pocket disbursal for concern usage within those 2 old ages that the instance was ongoing. It will non be taxed on and it will assist to take down John’s adjusted gross income for the revenue enhancement twelvemonth. but depending if John has claim it as portion of his tax write-offs yet or non. 1c ) . What is your finding sing cut downing the nonexempt sum of income for both ( a ) and ( B ) above?

In order to cut down the nonexempt sum of income for both ( a ) and ( B ) John would be better off in taking his $ 300. 000 in rente payments. instead than one ball amount. It will assist John to take down his revenue enhancement rate because his adjusted gross income is lower.

1d ) . Is it more good to go on renting the concern infinite or to purchase the edifice?
In order to find if it is more good to go on renting the concern infinite or to purchase the edifice. John will hold to compare the advantages and disadvantages of leasing and having a concern edifice. John will besides hold to mensurate his involvement disbursal and compare it to purchasing or renting. If John goes with renting the concern edifice he can still claim tax write-offs for his rent. However. if John purchased the edifice for his concern he would be able to claim involvement as portion of his tax write-offs every bit good as any care costs. revenue enhancements. and depreciation. It may be in the best involvement of John to go on renting the concern infinite.

Jane Smith revenue enhancement issues:
2a ) . What are the difference revenue enhancement effects between paying down the mortgage ( debt ) and presuming a new mortgage ( debt ) for federal income revenue enhancement intents?

If Jane and John Smith were refinanced their place. they wouldn’t be able to claim the full sum of their refinance as a tax write-off. In other words. they would lose revenue enhancement tax write-off on their loan when their mortgage is paid in full. On the other manus. if Jane and John Smith were to keep onto their mortgage and non pay it off they would be able to have certain revenue enhancement tax write-offs for it. For illustration. their mortgage involvement is a portion of revenue enhancement tax write-off that they can claim every twelvemonth. The twosome will hold to analyse every advantages and disadvantages to paying down the mortgage and presuming a new mortgage before being able to take farther action.

2b ) . Can John and Jane Smith use a 1031 revenue enhancement exchange to purchase a more expensive house utilizing extra money from John’s instance?
Bing able to put in a new place is a great investing and revenue enhancement nest eggs intents for John and Jane Smith. Since the IRS has an exchange codification that revenue enhancements merely the addition of a sale of personal place. John and Jane can use a 1031 revenue enhancement exchange to purchase a more expensive house utilizing extra money from John’s instance. The IRC Section 1031 provinces. “no addition or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of belongings held for productive usage in a trade or concern or for investing if such belongings is exchanged entirely for belongings of like sort which is to be held either for productive usage in a trade or concern or for investing. ” Since John and Jane is merely purchasing another belongings ( personal property/home. and non for concern intents ) they would be able to handle this dealing as an exchange instead than a bargain or sell dealing. John and Jane will merely be taxed if there is a addition on their dealing. Beginning:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. texas1031. com/reg/sec1031. htm

2c ) . Does Jane hold a concern or avocation? Why is this differentiation of import?
Jane would hold to separate herself if what she does at place ( jewellery devising ) is a concern or avocation. Publication 535 of the IRS aid in replying her inquiry if she is runing a concern or merely a avocation. 1. Make the clip and attempt put into the activity indicate an purpose to do a net income? 2. Does the taxpayer depend on the income from the activity? 3. Does the taxpayer or his/her advisers have the cognition needed to transport on the activity as a successful concern? 4. Does the activity make a net income in some old ages?

If yes is answered to all four inquiries. so yes. so Jane have a concern instead than a avocation. It is of import that Jane study this as a concern because she will be able to claim many more tax write-offs. Jane could subtract up to certain ( most ) concern disbursals that she uses. such as her ain vehicle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *