Death of Baby P Sample Essay

Peter Connelly besides known as Baby P was a British 17-months old male child who died in London in August 2007 after enduring more than 50 hurts over the eight-months period. during which he was repeatedly seen by Haringey Children’s Services. NHS Health Professionals and the Police ; all who committed a catalogue of mistakes which led to the Death of Baby P at the manus of his female parent and her sadistic fellow ( Mr H Baker ) . Harmonizing to the two Serious Case Review ( SCR ) released by the alliance and so Children Health Secretary Ed ball. which found the youngster’s ‘horrifying’ decease ‘could and should’ have been prevented by the public workers charged with protecting him. Baby P’s female parent ( Tracey Connelly ) told her societal worker that she had a fellow and in mid-2007. she named him as her following of Kin in wellness records. The societal worker did non inquire who he was or request to run into him. Besides child protection functionaries failed to set up Baker’s individuality. interview him and transport out background cheques on him.

The study besides stated that the societal worker ne’er thought Baby P was being harmed and considered his attention to be ‘a everyday. low hazard instance. necessitating household support’ . Baby P’s female parent was disorganised. dirty and smelly and was without much scruples but societal worker failed to face her because she intimidated staff. Crucially. societal workers accepted Connelly’s litany of prevarications about what happened to her. who she was populating with and who had contact with her kid. The study makes it clear that the warning marks were at that place from the start. as. merely yearss after Peter was born. a wellness worker visited the place and found it to be ‘very untidy’ . the instance was placed in a bluish booklet bespeaking it was a cause for concern- yet he was still failed until the twenty-four hours he died in a blood-spattered fingerstall in Tottenham. north east London. Throughout. wellness functionaries every bit good as the Police took a ‘sanguine’ position of Peter’s hurts.

Even when physicians took the position that the hurts had been inflicted intentionally. these were discounted. The constabulary strongly believed that Baby P’s hurts were non-accidental. but did non make their responsibility by accepting duty to look into the hurts. They besides swallowed Connelly’s history of Baker’s limited engagement. which showed a deficiency of thoroughness of constabulary probes. The household G. P accepted Connelly’s lies that Baby P’s bruised easy when he examined the babe at six months. In the concluding yearss of babe P’s life a G. P said he was in a ‘sorry state’ but did non watchful others. decides she can non transport out a full check-up as the male child is ‘miserable and cranky’ . A post-mortem scrutiny later reveals Peter had likely already suffered a broken dorsum and break ribs by this point.

Harmonizing to the Mail on Sunday 15 March 2009. reported that inside informations of the Serious Case Review initiated by Haringey Council had come into its ownership. It stated that there were cases of botching by functionaries. missed and delayed meetings. miscommunication among functionaries. and a failure to follow through with determinations related to he child’s safety. It besides noted among other issues that functionaries had non followed through with obtaining an ‘interim attention order’ that would hold removed Peter from his place when they had agreed that legal evidences had existed for making so six months before he died ; key functionaries besides failed to go to a 25 July 2007 meeting intended to make up one’s mind if it would be necessary to take Peter from his mother’s ma at that clip.