Equal Opportunity and the Education System in Pakistan Essay

Equal Opportunity and the Education System in Pakistan

The article in manus is a sociopolitical review about prevailing state of affairs of equal chances ( EO ) within the context of primary instruction in public sector in the educational system of Pakistan. The research is based on available published statistical informations to depict the issue of deficiency of EO. Researcher states that due to miss of documented informations, primary, secondary and higher instruction degrees of private sector are non discussed in this paper.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Rukhsana Zia is a instructor in authorities colleges for the past 25 old ages so the issue of EOs has been apparent to her, moreover her engagement in societal work motivated her to foreground the issue of EO for the societal consciousness of the policy shapers and contrivers. This paper tends to analyse the deficiency of equal chances in instruction system of Pakistan to place determiners of the bing state of affairs. Researcher besides provides a comparing between Pakistan and western universe sing the consciousness about deciding the issue of EO.

Researcher used critical societal theory to analyse and reflect on the state of affairs to place possible determiners for the EO, as critical theory criticizes society from some general theory of values and norms. The informations studied for research reveals a broad difference in the educational figures for the assorted states, urban and rural countries and for male childs and misss.

Researcher studied the documented informations about gross registration rate ( GER ) and the school entry rate of primary school kids and concluded that there is an huge difference between the school entry rate among the states, the rural/urban and the male/female. She claims that the highest school entry rate was found in Punjab, followed by Sindh and NWFP and so Baluchistan. Furthermore GERs were higher in urban countries as compared to rural countries ( 87 and 63 per centum severally ) and for male childs comparative to misss ( 78 and 61 per centum severally ) . In the visible radiation of the above, research worker believes that a prejudice exists in the educational system and EO is non a feasible force in the scheming of the instruction system of the state.

Researcher analyses the predominating instruction system of the state to place the determiners of the bing state of affairs. She believes that quality of instruction, entree and status of schools, deficient support by authorities and hapless direction of the instruction system are the causal factors of bing state of affairs.

Researcher uses informations collected by PIHS ( Pakistan Integrated Household Survey ) to determine that 57 per centum of misss whereas 18 per centum of male childs are non allowed by parents to go to the school which establishes the fact that favoritism against females dominates in the socio-cultural forms of the state. In malice of all fluctuations, the common factor observed by research worker in every state and part, was the relationship between parents’ income/education and school attending i.e. poorer households do non direct their kids to school as stated by Shavit and Blossfeld ( 1993 ) , the impact of parental socioeconomic position on children’s educational chance remained stable or even widened. Treiman, Ganzeboom, and Rijken ( 2003 ) argue that father’s educational degree increased children’s opportunities of deriving higher instruction. This delineates the fact that socio-cultural prejudices are farther amplified by poorness.

On the footing of PIHS informations, research worker provides a discourse about non-government ( NG ) schools. Researcher states that out of the blue, many kids even from low-income households attend NG schools because they frequently provide higher quality instruction than authorities schools. This grounds confirms that quality instruction is a prerequisite along with issues of equal chance and entree. Researcher articulates that the private schools are extremely priced, and supply a better quality of instruction than the public sector. Consequently kids from the lower socio-economic strata lose their opportunity to quality instruction, and this factor places them at a disadvantage when viing for occupations in ulterior life. Desai, Adams, and Dubey ( 2006 ) argue that we have come across many cases in which inequalities in instruction consequence into favoritism in entree to authorities services and employment. Same point of view is supported by Halsey, Heath, and Ridge 1980 ; Hauser and Featherman 1976, that inequality in instruction between different societal strata continues and sometimes even widens in malice of educational growing. This increases the duty on the populace sector to supply instruction to all so that income disagreement does non impact the chances to a better quality of life, either at place or at work.

Researcher so compares the state of affairs of EO in Pakistan to similar state of affairss in other states and observes a huge difference in positions of developed states and Pakistan, an developing economic system. Both are undertaking the issue of EO, but at different degrees. The West has the added advantage of 100 per centum registrations in its schools, which is non so in Pakistan. Furthermore most developed states of the universe have introduced the construct of EO in their course of study, learning aims, schoolroom environment, learning stuffs and schemes. West is covering with the issue within its schoolrooms whereas Pakistan has yet to incite a socio-cultural attitudinal alteration in the public.

By maintaining the limited entree of kids to instruction in head, research worker emphasizes the measure demands for instruction along with the quality issues. She suggests that Pakistan clearly needs to decide the issue of EO at the community degree so EO patterns should be commenced inside and outside the school at the same clip. In the shutting research worker emphasizes the demand for effectual and sustainable solution to the bing state of affairs of deficiency of EO in footings of country, gender, and societal category.

Researcher picked up a really sensitive educational and societal issue but in my sentiment could non warrant the job as there is repeat of same issues throughout the paper. Data is non handled, displayed and discussed in an effectual manner. Pie charts would be more effectual for comparing of variables. Although it was mentioned in the restrictions of the survey that due to non handiness of informations, NG schools are non included in the research but there were treatments about NG schools throughout the paper.

Writing manner and linguistic communication of research worker is non clear accordingly the research does non magnetise the involvement of reader. Possible solutions are non suggested to the issues discussed in the research paper and if suggested, those are quite obscure. Furthermore private sector plays an of import function in instruction system of Pakistan which is wholly neglected in this paper. An empirical research is suggested to analyse Equal Opportunities issues in private sector OR a comparative survey of either equal chances or quality of instruction in private and public sector could be conducted.

Mentions

Desai, S. , C.D. Adams, and A. Dubey. 2006. “In the Margins: Social Inequalities in Children’s Educational Outcomes in India.” Paper presented at the one-year meeting of the Population Association of America, March 30–April 1, Los Angeles.

Halsey, A.H. , A. Heath, and J.M. Ridge. 1980.Beginnings and Finishs.Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hauser, R.M. and D.L. Featherman. 1976.“Equality of Schooling: Tendencies and Prospects.”Sociology of Education49:99–120.

Shavit, Y. and H.-P. Blossfeld, eds. 1993.Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder: Westview Press.

Treiman, D.T. , H.G.B. Ganzeboom, and S. Rijken. 2003. “Educational Expansion and Educational Achievement in Comparative Perspective.”California Center for Population Research Working Paper CCPR-007-03. University of California, Los Angeles.

1

Ayesha Khawar