The Contributions of Emile Durkheim to Sociology Sample Essay

Emile Durkheim was one of the most of import theoreticians within the history of sociology for a figure of different grounds. It is possibly the sheer scope of his parts that are most of import. In many ways he invented the sociological point of view towards offense. faith. self-destruction and instruction. He is now widely regarded as the “Father of Sociology” . and the bookman who most enabled the thought that there could be such a thing as “societalscience” within the academia.

One of the chief parts of Durkheim was to explicate the thought of a scientific survey of society which was every bit possible as the analysis of physical phenomenon. Most significantly. he sought to demo how assorted establishments and tendencies within society contributed to it as amap. These thoughts were basically the beginning of the whole theory of functionalism within the field of sociology. Durkheim developed the thought of “social facts” which are aspects of society which are someway divorced from the Acts of the Apostless of persons. These “facts” lead to the sociological tendencies that are now studied within the modern field of sociology.

While he helped to develop the thought of wider tendencies within society. Durkheim besides contributed to an apprehension of how persons might respond within peculiar state of affairss. In his celebrated workSuicide. Durkheim examined what happens to people who end up experiencing a sense ofanomy. particularly within big metropoliss in which they are surrounded by people but may experience a entire sense of disaffection. In many ways this was a precursor to many different sociological surveies of minority and stray groups within society. particularly within the urban inner-cities which are now so hapless.

Durkheim work on self-destruction besides contributed to integration theory. in which sociologists study how far a society ( or group/culture within that society ) is organized and integrated. or disorganized and integrated. In this mode the relationship between the person and society was concentrated upon. another great part to the whole field of sociology. He besides contributed greatly to that facet of sociology which deals withoffense. peculiarly the map of offense within society. Unlike those of his coevalss who say offense as simply a “problem” that needed to be solved. or through the moral lens of “good” and “evil” Durkheim suggested that offense really had a functional function to play within society.

He regarded offense as really “normal” because there was no society in which it did non happen. Crime enabled the safe ( every bit long as it was limited ) release of societal and single unease which is inevitable within a civilization of groups. Crime acted as a kind of purging for tensenesss within society. Durkheim was critical in organizing a scientific. nonsubjective analysis of offense instead than the affectional attitude of disapprobation which is possibly apprehensible. but non utile in a scholarly sense. Again. the delivery of the scientific method. which is basicallyimpersonalto the topic of offense gave a whole new field of enterprise to sociology.

Durkheim’s work within instruction may be seen as a precursor to the more socially active and politically witting signifier of sociology that is now so popular. He state instruction as the path to halting the sense of anomy within society by leting persons to experience connected with their universe. He besides sought to analyze faith in a sociological sense. inquiring what its map was within society and how it contributed to societal controls and the hardening of a common civilization within society. The analysis of faith in such an nonsubjective manner was extremely controversial at the clip. but enabled a whole subdivision of sociology to take off and flourish. Durkheim suggested that the map of faith was ab initio to give the person a sense of belonging within a group. and therefore contributed to the societal coherence of a group that was so needed for a successful society. Durkheim didnonseek to religious claims of faiths as they were far beyond the scope of his survey: he analyzed those folks who practicedtotemismin as a serious a mode as he studied Catholicism.

To reason. Durkheim’s parts to sociology are extraordinary. He would hold been a major theoretician if he had concentrated within merely one of his many Fieldss of enterprise. allow entirely all of them. His scientific survey of a whole scope of constructions and maps within society were the beginning of the whole academic subject of Sociology. The personal conflicts that he had to contend against fellow faculty members who would non accept that human societies could be studied in such a mode enabled hereafter bookmans. up to today. to analyze societies without invariably necessitating to “prove” that such surveies were valid. So his parts were broad. profound and priceless. He is justifiably called the “Father of Sociology” .

Plants Cited

Durkheim. Emile.Suicide. Free Press. New York: 1997.

Rules of Sociological Method. Free Press. New York: 1982.

Readings from Emile Durkheim.Routledge. New York: 1985.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *