The Nature Of Truth Essay Research Paper

The Nature Of Truth Essay, Research Paper

The nature of truth has been linked with the good and the beautiful as one of adult male & # 8217 ; s supreme values. The chase of truth is identical in pattern from the chase of cognition, whether about the environment, nature, cultural responsibilities and thoughts, or the relation to the Godhead. ( Boodin 208-209 ) The complete apprehension of the nature of truth is non humanely accomplishable.

From the natural events in our lives, we have thoughts that we find are our personal truths. From these thoughts, we have learned to grok life with ground and logic and we have found our thought of world ( Edwards 130 ) . But it is our sense of ground and logic and our thought of truth that may probably to be incorrect. Truth exists but is non absolute ; Do we of all time come to an apprehension of what truth is or is it still out at that place for people to inquire about? If my truth differs from your truth that can merely be because either one or both of us is incognizant of the truth and has called something true which is non. ( Edwards 130-131 ) . Mohandas Gandhi radius of & # 8220 ; The Absolute Truth, the Eternal Principle, that is God & # 8221 ; and said, & # 8221 ; I worship God as Truth only. & # 8221 ; Jesus said, & # 8221 ; I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. & # 8221 ; God is truth and the kernel of it. All of his ways are truth and all truth stands or falls as it is measured against Him. He wants us to cognize the truth, which is to cognize him. God places the truth before us and gives us complete freedom to take how to react to the truth ensuing in many different significances of truth ( Krishnamurti 119 )

The nature of truth is more and beyond that which is true. For 1000s of old ages, Philosophers have attempted to reply the inquiry & # 8220 ; What is Truth? & # 8221 ; Truth is the quality of being true, and anything that is true, is a truth. & # 8220 ; An thought makes a truth claim and is true when the character of what is thought about upholds its claim & # 8221 ; ( Krishnamurti 39 ) . Man has no innate thoughts and that makes truth single. Basically there are no simple thoughts and everything could hold multiple significances. Since work forces create words and the words create the truth, truth so is a comparative term. Truth is a construct in doctrine that treats the significance of true and the criterions by which we judge the truth or falseness in written statements. ( Boodin 158 ) . This can be explained by stating a set of words is true when it expresses a true idea. Rene Descartes, one time said, & # 8220 ; I am, [ therefore ] I exist. & # 8221 ; This statement contains the lone truth found for certain in our & # 8220 ; natural & # 8221 ; experience that, as witting existences, we exist. Whether we are our ain Godheads, a creative activity, or the object of development, every bit long as we know that we think, we prove to be. Descartes claims, & # 8220 ; But surely I should be, if I were to carry my ego of something. & # 8221 ; Our being is a truth, and may be the lone truth, that we know is certain ( Solomon 158 ) .

Plato developed an early version of the corr

espondence theory. He sought to understand the significance of cognition and how it is acquired ( Boodin 173 ) . Plato wanted to separate between true and false belief. His theory was based on intuitive acknowledgment that true statements correspond to the facts, while false statements do non. Plato recognized this theory as unsatisfactory because it did non let false belief. Plato stated that if a belief was false because no fact proved it to be true, so it would be a belief about nil, or non even a belief at all. The correspondence theory of truth is an illustration of the unsolved construct of truth by non being able to explicate any certain nature of truth itself ( Boodin 175 ) .

Apart from the confirmed truth that we exist, no other truths are definite, for the fact that subjective truth may be easy contradicted. Everybody has his or her ain truth that may be conflicting to another individual & # 8217 ; s. What one individual may presume, a Canis familiaris is a adult male & # 8217 ; s best friend, another may believe that a Canis familiariss is a adult male & # 8217 ; s worse enemy. Our judgement of what is true depends on our ain experiences, and how things becomes true for us ( Krishnamurti 31 ) . Aristotle would hold us believe that truth exists within the combination of thoughts and the same would travel for falseness. Truth or falsity can non be when the thoughts are isolated. So harmonizing to Aristotle there are merely a smattering of truths in the existence. The remainder are merely comparative depending upon the context in which you use them. Every idea, besides the thought that we think, has the chance that it may be proven incorrect. An illustration could be the initial thought of the Earth being level. We would likely hold to alter our thought of truth to the judgements of experts ( Boodin 212 ) . This illustration we may hold one time believed to be the absolute truth, may be proven incorrect at any clip, and what we truly know, may non be the truth after all.

We may seek for the reply of truth until the terminal of clip, when God says to us that the lone truths are in him. Jack Handy had the most logical reply to the inquiry of truth when he said: & # 8220 ; To me, truth is non some vague, dazed impression. Truth is existent. And, at the same clip, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between, plus some things I can & # 8217 ; t retrieve, all rolled into one large & # 8220 ; thing. & # 8221 ; This is truth, to me. & # 8221 ; ( Www.hooked.net ) . Thinking about our ideas is grounds of our uneasiness. The thoughts that we encounter are determined true by personal rating in the associations of those thoughts with ourselves. & # 8220 ; I am, [ therefore ] I exist, & # 8221 ; may be the lone statement with any cogency of our certainty ( Solomon 158 ) . So we can non prove the soundness of our world, ground, logic, and truth, but we can prove to the truth of our being by believing, hence, being.

I used this for a first twelvemonth doctrine category, I don & # 8217 ; t believe my T.A.liked it, he is doing me come in to travel & # 8220 ; over it with him & # 8221 ; .

Bibliography

none provided